| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/10/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/03/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
FIORENTINI, G.; CARVALHO, I. P. C.; MESSANA, J. D.; CASTAGNINO, P. S.; BERNDT, A.; CANESIN, R. C.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; BERCHIELLI, T. T. |
|
Afiliação: |
G. FIORENTINI, São Paulo State University; I. P. C. CARVALHO, São Paulo State University; J. D. MESSANA, São Paulo State University; P. S. CASTAGNINO, São Paulo State University; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, CPPSE; R. C. CANESIN, São Paulo State University; ROSA TOYOKO SHIRAISHI FRIGHETTO, CNPMA; T. T. BERCHIELLI, São Paulo State University. |
|
Título: |
Effect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and methane emissions of feedlot Nellore steers. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Animal Science, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1613-1620, apr. 2014. |
|
DOI: |
10.2527/jas.2013-6868 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compared to animals that were fed the other diets. Therefore, PO compared to the other lipid sources used in this study reduces intake, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass yield. Therefore, PO is not suggested for feedlot-finished animals. MenosThe present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compare... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Emissão de metano; Fat whole soybeans; Intake; Oil palm; Oil protected. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado nelore; Linhaça; Metano; Novilho; Nutrição animal; Óleo vegetal. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Fatty acids; linseed; Linseed oil; Methane; Palm oils; Protected fat; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02962naa a2200433 a 4500
001 2003775
005 2023-03-29
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2013-6868$2DOI
100 1 $aFIORENTINI, G.
245 $aEffect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and methane emissions of feedlot Nellore steers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $aThe present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compared to animals that were fed the other diets. Therefore, PO compared to the other lipid sources used in this study reduces intake, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass yield. Therefore, PO is not suggested for feedlot-finished animals.
650 $aFatty acids
650 $alinseed
650 $aLinseed oil
650 $aMethane
650 $aPalm oils
650 $aProtected fat
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aGado nelore
650 $aLinhaça
650 $aMetano
650 $aNovilho
650 $aNutrição animal
650 $aÓleo vegetal
653 $aEmissão de metano
653 $aFat whole soybeans
653 $aIntake
653 $aOil palm
653 $aOil protected
700 1 $aCARVALHO, I. P. C.
700 1 $aMESSANA, J. D.
700 1 $aCASTAGNINO, P. S.
700 1 $aBERNDT, A.
700 1 $aCANESIN, R. C.
700 1 $aFRIGHETTO, R. T. S.
700 1 $aBERCHIELLI, T. T.
773 $tJournal of Animal Science$gv. 92, n. 4, p. 1613-1620, apr. 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/11/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
BARLOW, J.; LEES, A. C.; SIST, P.; ALMEIDA, R.; ARANTES, C. C.; ARMENTERAS, D.; BERENGUER, E.; CARON, P.; CUESTA, F.; DORIA, C. R. C.; FERREIRA, J. N.; FLECKER, A.; HEILPERN, S.; KALAMANDEEN, M.; PEÑA-CLAROS, M.; PIPONIOT, C.; POMPEU, P. S.; SOUZA, C.; VALENTIM, J. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOS BARLOW, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK; ALEXANDER C. LEES, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK; PLINIO SIST, Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), France / Université de Montpellier, France; RAFAEL ALMEIDA, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; CAROLINE C. ARANTES, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA; DOLORS ARMENTERAS, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; ERIKA BERENGUER, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK / University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; PATRICK CARON, Université de Montpellier, France; FRANCISCO CUESTA, Universidad de Las Américas (UDLA), Quito, Ecuador; CAROLINA R. C. DORIA, Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR); JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; ALEXANDER FLECKER, Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), France; SEBASTIAN HEILPERN, Cornell University, USA; MICHELLE KALAMANDEEN, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; MARIELOS PEÑA-CLAROS, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands; CAMILLE PIPONIOT, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute & Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Republic of Panama; PAULO SANTOS POMPEU, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA); CARLOS SOUZA, Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (IMAZON); JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-AC. |
|
Título: |
Conservation measures to counter the main threats to Amazonian biodiversity. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SCIENCE panel for the Amazon: Amazon assessment report 2021: part III: The Solution space: finding sustainable pathways for the Amazon. New York, NY: United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2021. |
|
Páginas: |
Cap. 27, p. irreg. |
|
DOI: |
10.55161/DTTQ9410 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Present-day human activities are reducing and altering Amazonian biodiversity and disrupting the functioning of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Chapter 19 & 20). This chapter outlines some of the approaches required to address the main threats to the Amazon's biodiversity and ecosystems, i.e., deforestation, damming of rivers, mining, hunting, illegal trade, drug production and trafficking, illegal logging, overfishing, and infrastructure expansion. The role of restoration is addressed in Chapters 28 and 29. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Biodiversity conservation; Conservación de la biodiversidad; Degradación ambiental. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Conservação; Impacto Ambiental. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; Environmental degradation; Environmental impact. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1159185/1/Conservation-measures.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/227949/1/27225.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01987naa a2200469 a 4500
001 2159185
005 2023-12-05
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.55161/DTTQ9410$2DOI
100 1 $aBARLOW, J.
245 $aConservation measures to counter the main threats to Amazonian biodiversity.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $aCap. 27, p. irreg.
520 $aPresent-day human activities are reducing and altering Amazonian biodiversity and disrupting the functioning of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Chapter 19 & 20). This chapter outlines some of the approaches required to address the main threats to the Amazon's biodiversity and ecosystems, i.e., deforestation, damming of rivers, mining, hunting, illegal trade, drug production and trafficking, illegal logging, overfishing, and infrastructure expansion. The role of restoration is addressed in Chapters 28 and 29.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aEnvironmental degradation
650 $aEnvironmental impact
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aConservação
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
653 $aBiodiversity conservation
653 $aConservación de la biodiversidad
653 $aDegradación ambiental
700 1 $aLEES, A. C.
700 1 $aSIST, P.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R.
700 1 $aARANTES, C. C.
700 1 $aARMENTERAS, D.
700 1 $aBERENGUER, E.
700 1 $aCARON, P.
700 1 $aCUESTA, F.
700 1 $aDORIA, C. R. C.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N.
700 1 $aFLECKER, A.
700 1 $aHEILPERN, S.
700 1 $aKALAMANDEEN, M.
700 1 $aPEÑA-CLAROS, M.
700 1 $aPIPONIOT, C.
700 1 $aPOMPEU, P. S.
700 1 $aSOUZA, C.
700 1 $aVALENTIM, J. F.
773 $tIn: SCIENCE panel for the Amazon: Amazon assessment report 2021: part III: The Solution space: finding sustainable pathways for the Amazon. New York, NY: United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
